Hidden Eloise vs Paperchase and other animals
I know, I know, it’s been a helluva long time since I’ve posted here. Truthfully, that’s because I haven’t been doing a lot of film stuff: concentrating instead on my day job for working for amazing arts company Artichoke.
However, two things have happened recently.
The first: I filmed the Cambridge Lindy Hoppers’ performance in dance show ‘Signatures’ at the ADC a few weeks ago. You can see the film below. It’s pretty basic: one camera pointed at the stage. I did take a load of detailed shots with my second, less posh camera. However, the dancers just wanted to be able to see how they all looked as a group. I felt it would be a waste of their time and mine to put in a load of shots of individuals’ feet or hand movements. So, here you go:
The second thing has nothing to do with film and everything to do with creativity. If you have a twitter account and check it regularly, you can’t have failed to notice the #paperchase hashtag has been getting rather a lot of use over the last few days. The basic story is that independent artist Hidden Eloise was made aware by a friend that one of her artworks was being badly traced over and sold as a range of products by high street store Paperchase.
Eloise duly contacted Paperchase and made them aware that someone had stolen her design. They informed her that she was mistaken. The lawyer fees that were quoted to her were well out of the range of anyone earning a decent wage, let alone a struggling artist. To see the two images and how closely they match, see the video below:
So Eloise posted something on Twitter, which was duly re-tweeted by author Neil Gaiman – someone with 1.5 million followers on the social networking site. All hell broke loose on Twitter, and soon Paperchase was being bombarded with angry messages.
Eventually it turned out that Paperchase had got the artwork from design agency Gather No Moss (who have since removed their contact details from their website), who in turn posted a message saying that they had got the design from an artist, who strenuously denies any wrong-doing. Hidden Eloise states that she is going after Paperchase (I’m not sure why she isn’t putting more effort into pursuing the artist who actually traced her work, but…).
When I read about this case it made me incredibly angry, in a way I haven’t been angry in a very long time. I’ve been a struggling artist before (not ‘art art’ – theatre – but still). I know how difficult it can be. To have someone just come along and make a load of money from your hard work is a bitter pill to swallow on its own. But to then have them deny what is blatantly true – to, in fact, accuse you of causing a fuss over nothing. Well, it smacks of big corporation bullying, something I would not have pinned on Paperchase before. All they had to do was to apologise to Eloise, give her some money in recompense and fire the design agency. They would have come out of the whole affair squeaky clean and smelling of freshly cut grass, lavender and cute puppies.
I ended up writing an email to Paperchase and Gather No Moss. As yet I have heard nothing from the design agency. From Paperchase, however, I received n extremely snippy email stating that “it is a shame that people believe everything they read on websites.”
No, Mr Paperchase, we believe our eyes. Now go employ someone who actually knows a bit about PR.
Anyway, I’ve put some links to sites of interest concerning this case. If, once you’ve read all the evidence, you too believe that Hidden Eloise has been treated appallingly, please write to Paperchase and Gather No Moss an express your opinions.
The Guardian’s article on the affair
Oh, and one more thing – the power that Twitter users seem to have to make things happen is also making me rather excited about the possibilities of a filming project I’ve got up my sleeve. More on that soon – I promise.
UPDATE: A few hours ago the designer admitted that she had copied Hidden Eloise’s drawing. She apologised to Eloise and so did Gather No Moss. Paperchase, on the other hand, are denying all culpability and answering complaint emails giving out the designer’s name. I know that they didn’t know about the copy before it happened but their handling has been appalling: they have not yet apologised to Eloise for dragging her reputation through the mud and accusing her of lying in the National Press. Bad form, Paperchase. Very bad form indeed.

